If you need to contact MarkCC, his email address is markcc@gmail.com. You can also find him on twitter as MarkCC.

Scientopia Blogs

Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2013
 March 2013
 February 2013
 January 2013
 December 2012
 November 2012
 October 2012
 September 2012
 August 2012
 July 2012
 June 2012
 May 2012
 April 2012
 March 2012
 February 2012
 January 2012
 December 2011
 November 2011
 October 2011
 September 2011
 August 2011
 July 2011
 June 2011
 May 2011
 April 2011
 March 2011
 February 2011
 January 2011
 December 2010
 November 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 August 2010
 July 2010
 June 2010
 May 2010
 April 2010
 March 2010
 February 2010
 January 2010
 December 2009
 November 2009
 October 2009
 September 2009
 August 2009
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 January 2008
 December 2007
 November 2007
 October 2007
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007
 April 2007
 March 2007
 February 2007
 January 2007
 December 2006
 November 2006
 October 2006
 September 2006
 August 2006
 July 2006
 June 2006
Categories
 Abstract Algebra
 Bad Algebra
 Bad Economics
 Bad Logic
 Bad Math
 Bad Math Education
 Bad Physics
 Bad Probability
 Bad Software
 Bad Statistics
 Basics
 Book
 Cantor Crankery
 Category Theory
 Chatter
 classics
 climate
 complex analysis
 Computation
 Cryptography
 Data Structures
 Debunking Creationism
 Distributed Systems
 Egnorance
 Erlang
 fundamentalism
 Game Theory
 Good Math
 Good Physics
 goodmath
 Graph Theory
 Group Theory
 Haskell
 HIV denial
 Incompleteness
 Intelligent Design
 lambda calculus
 Logic
 Machine Language
 manual computing devices
 Meta
 Music
 Numbers
 Numerology
 Obfuscatory Math
 pathological programming
 People
 Personal
 Physics
 politics
 Politics
 probability
 Programming
 Recipes
 sexism
 Society
 statistics
 topology
 Uncategorized
 Warming
 woo
Meta
Hi Mark,
I'm a guy from China, I love your site, and have learnt a lot from it, that's a great blog, I spread your blog with my colleagues, and they all love it and keep it in the bookmark and visit it at times.
Would you please the "Select Category" function? Seems that it doesn't work on your new homepage, whatever I select from the popup list, either "Haskell" or "Category Theory", they all show me nothing, that's the reason for me, maybe for lots or other guys, still visit your old blog from scienceblogs
Looking forward to reading more great math/computer science articles from you.
We would support you always, just as we have done in the last few years!
Best Regards,
Harry
Bees and NPHard problem:
http://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/items/se/38864.html
My gut says that the PR is overstating the paper. Possible article?
Hi, Mark,
Watching Jeopardy last night, I saw that one of the IBM scientists involved with the Watson project, or perhaps a spokesperson for IBM in general, was your wife!
Niw, I don't know you or her, so this is a bit of an assumpton, and perhaps presumption, but I do remember you discussing on your blog, how you came to select your names. I became so excited seeing your (and my) surname on the TV, that I didn't actually hear what she had to say. I was too busy explaining to my wife my (minimal) connection to you.
It's been a while since I read this blog, but I recall commenting once, a few years ago, using the moniker, "Bob from Yorktown Hts" or some such. Another minimal connection  I don't work for IBM, but have visited the Watson Research Center as a neighbor (and sometime research chemist). My neighbor and friend Vishnu Patel acted as guide.
It was fun seeing the structure of Watson on Jeopardy. I was a bit surprised to hear that the memory of that massive computer was only about 15 terabytes, if I heard correctly. Of course this is a lot of memory, but within reach for a PC user... It's amazing how cheap memory storage has become since the advent of the original IBM Winchester drive.
I'm rooting for Ken Jennings. It was interesting to note that the contest (the first day, anyway,) was not a runaway success by Watson.
After the show, I described the Turing test to my wife, opining that Watson could pass this test, or at least give a good account of itself!
I'll be reading your site more regularly again. Math is a better recreation than just about any other intellectual activity.
Bob Carroll
Code reviews are probably implicitly discouraged in undergraduate classes, in part because grades are meant to represent individual achievement. And I haven't heard much about code reviews in software engineering classes where people are grouped together. Perhaps the closest thing students get to a code review is that from their professor.
Hey Mark,
I saw your site while trying to do some numerology debunking. Any thoughts about karmic debt numbers? It looks like scare tactics to me but I wanted a real mathematical opinion on this.
Thanks,
 Alex
SQUARE – CIRCULAR ARC – CIRCLE
Arc represents the relationship between the circumference of the circle and the
perimeter on the subscribed squares the circle.
Expressed as a formula:
Arc = C : P
Arc – circular arc
C – circumference of the circle
P – perimeter on the subscribed squares the circle
Arc is also a relationship between the value of the approximation and the second
root from eight.
Expressed as a formula:
Arc = Ap : √8
Ap – approximation
From this it follows that the value of the circular arch as constants, in addition to the value of the approximation can be used to calculate the value of the c
METHOD OF CALCULATION THE CIRCUMFERENCE
OF THE CIRCLE WITH THE CIRCULAR ARC
a * arc = a1
P = 4 * a1 = 2r * Ap = C
a – side on the subscribed squares the circle
a1 – side on the squares with same perimeter as circle
P – perimeter on the squares
C – circumference of the circle
D * arc = D1
P = D1 * √8 = 2r * Ap = C
D – diagonal on the subscribed squares the circle
D1 – diagonal on the squares with same perimeter as circle
METHOD OF CALCULATING THE AREA OF A CIRCLE
WITH A CIRCULAR ARC
a * arc = a1 D * arc = D1
Area rectangle = a * D1 = (r * r) * Ap = Area circle
Area rectangle = a1 * D = (r * r) * Ap = Area circle
a – side on the subscribed squares on the circle
a1 – side on the squares with same perimeter as circle
D – diagonal on the subscribed squares on the circle
D1 – diagonal on the squares with same perimeter as circle
This method of calculating the circumference and area of the circle can beapplied in all approximations, but geometrically, we can only draw an approximation of the results, the following value (3,142696805...)
Ap = √8 * 10/9 = 3,142696805.. or Ap = √8 + (√8/9) = 3,142696805
hi, i thought you might be interested in this crock
http://vortexmath.webs.com/
im sorry lily you didn't invent the Rodin coil . Marko Rodin did . and it works .unlike the useless whining from your comment.
Hi Mark, here's another one for the doubtless growing pile of cracked pottery.
http://existics101.com/
Greetings,
I'm not calling this a crock... however, something just doesn't seem correct about this and I can't put my finger on in.
http://phys.org/news/201308cosmologistuniverse.html
There's some pretty good bad math and physics here:
http://www.wildheretic.com/